Skip to main content
English Cymraeg
Impacts of Food Hypersensitivities on Quality of Life in the UK and Willingness to Pay (WTP) to remove those impacts

Appendix N: Risk Attitudes Results

To derive a measure of risk preferences, questions from the SOEP (German Socioeconomic Panel) were included in the severe. These questions (below) ask about willingness to take risks overall, and in specific domains.

The propensity to commit to (one’s child) taking a pill to eliminate a food hypersensitivity was hypothesised to potentially be affected by one’s attitude to risk as well as characteristics such as the severity of the condition.

To derive a measure of risk preferences, questions from the SOEP (German Socioeconomic Panel) were included in the severe. These questions (below) ask about willingness to take risks overall, and in specific domains.

Figure 1 SOEP Risk Attitude question

Details explained in the text.

Figure 1 SOEP Risk Attitude question (accessible version)

Are you generally a person who is fully prepared to take risks or do you try to avoid taking risk? (please choose an option where 0 means 'risk averse' and 10 means fully prepared to take risks'.

People can behave differently in different situations.

How would you rate your willingness to take risks in the following areas?

  • while driving...
  • in financial matters
  • during leisure and sports...
  • in your occupation...
  • with your health...
  • your faith in other people

The scores were transformed to range from 1-11 and the distribution of responses is displayed here – with a skew towards risk aversion evident.

Figure 2 Distribution of risks responses

Details explained in the text.

Table 3: Tabulation of how risk averse are you?

Risk scale Frequency Percent Cumulative
1 (risk averse) 167 11.71 11.71
2 89 6.24 17.95
3 151 10.59 28.54
4 160 11.22 39.76
5 115 8.06 47.83
6 263 18.44 66.27
7 153 10.73 77.00
8 161 11.29 88.29
9 98 6.87 95.16
10 25 1.75 96.91
11 (fully prepared to take risks) 44 3.09 100.00
Total 1426 100.00 -

The mean score was computed across all 7 questions (the distribution of scores for the 6 additional risk questions are below).

The distribution of the aggregated risk attitude scores is shown here – with a skew to the left (risk aversion evident).

Figure 3 Distribution of Aggregated risk score

Details explained in the text.

Figure 4 Distribution of the responses to the six specific risk questions

How risk averse are you while driving?

Almost half of respondents admitted to being risk averse.

How risk averse are you in financial matters?

Almost half of respondents admitted to being risk averse.

How risk averse are you during leisure and sports?

Over half chose risk averse and just under half chose a score of 6.

How risk averse are you in your occupation?

Just under a quarter of participants chose risk adverse.

How risk averse are you with your health?

Just under 30% chose risk averse.

How risk averse are you with your faith in other people?

Just under 25% chose 6 on the risk averse scale.